Toward a Quantum Ontology
Necessary Beeing :
“Learning Marxism feels very similar to learning Thomism. It's
difficult to understand one part without already grasping how it all hangs
together. Probably the same with German Idealism.”
Me:
This ("how things hold together"/Verslammung) is also checked in a more
neutral way than German Idealism's holism in the French Structralisme, until
they have discovered an element that cannot be called neither "one
part" of a whole, nor dialectisable in it (and resiste it, giving and
taking place as a différance): but an aporetical exclusif-inclusif…
If in a day, in a futur or in a scriptural past (in a
such impossible concept of ‘trace’ that tracing itself and
becoming), whenever we will (been) had discovered (as) a “tiers exclut” (third exclued),
not only in a narrow meaning of non-contadictory logic, but in a more larger
and deeper, ontologicaly exponential and
differral meaning, as a “more than exclued” in two directions
at least, toward an exclusivity in measure of increasing direction of
inclusivity in a whole il-limitated, and vice
versa, we will be more ables resolve our problems that we had created and
we are already and will be more and more the issues of them..
This means an ontology already non statical, but
dynamic (Bergson), in the becoming of trace, and more properly, in behalf of,
holded-in toward a quantum ontology that challenge with “meontology” our reception of quarks-Weltbildung.
Hiç yorum yok:
Yorum Gönder